Tuesday, September 14, 2010

Le Baiser de la Fée - Dinners with Patrick White

This short story is about the encounters of a naif suburban young man with the great writer in the seventies. Through his tenuous association with White he also meets Christina Stead and the Duttons - Geoff and Nin. And Manoli Lascaris. And others. It was first published by gay-ebooks  http://www.gay-ebooks.com.au as a free download in their Queer Hearts anthology.















LE BAISER DE LA FÉE 
Dinner with Patrick White 
After the Musica Viva concert (the Amadeus Quartet) I stood beside the uni 
acquaintance who now worked for the Council for the Arts while he schmoozed 
and was schmoozed by Maria Prerauer. The Musica Viva crowd still had a 
sprinkling of the astrakhan collared and coated. It was a freezing winter’s night in 
the days when we still had such things and astrakhan had not yet become extinct 
in Sydney.  
I ended up giving Mrs Prerauer a lift home and being invited in for coffee. I 
accepted out of a confusion of thinking I needed to know such people (she was a 
music critic who wrote for The Sydney Morning Herald), interest and fear that it 
would be bad manners not to. 
It transpired I was required to listen to a diatribe principally against the Nazi 
Elizabeth Schwarzkopf, Mistress of a Kommandant of a concentration camp, but 
also against some others. 
I held myself very still during this, as I was, for several reasons, appalled. One of 
them was that I adored Elizabeth Schwarzkopf and was ‘one of that type of young 
man – you know what I mean? – who cheers after every song and some even run 
to the stage and throw flowers’. I had had no idea Elizabeth Schwarzkopf had 
been the Mistress of anyone, much less the Kommandant of a concentration 
camp. Also I knew I was ‘one of that type of young man’ and was wondering just 
how many others knew – you know what I mean? I was far too stitched up to 
cheer and throw flowers. 
 2 
I didn’t know what to say, so I nodded and upon leaving gave Maria Prerauer a 
kiss in consolation, of faux rapport. She reeled back then looked rather thrilled.  
A few weeks later I was astonished to receive a phone call from her. I was to 
come to ‘a simple meal’ and talk to Patrick White about Australian literature. I 
later learned my Australia Council friend couldn’t make it so he had given Mrs 
Prerauer my phone number. 
It was just the four of us (though Mr Prerauer tended to stay out of his wife’s 
action) and kept simple for me. Mrs Prerauer thimbled out my wine (Patrick White 
got a whisky) and we ate like aristocratic nuns (a slice of smoked salmon, in 
those days a rarity, and a slice of roast veal). Despite my hostess’s efforts (she 
had probably been warned) I got drunk but stayed sealed in politeness and 
predictable responses. My moment of danger was when White, who had all but 
pointedly ignored me, suddenly turned and demanded, ‘And what do you think of 
Barbara Baynton?’  
My self had been racing around its innerscape delighting in reflections on the 
situation it found itself trapped in and fantasies of being elsewhere, or scintillating 
in this one. So while I felt the searching light of interrogation had suddenly been 
shone into my eyes, I was too drunk with the thimbles of wine and by this stage 
boredom and insult to be paralysed in its glare.  
I came to the realisation I had not thought of Barbara Baynton very much but 
here was some sort of opportunity to step forth in this room at this table as 
myself for a moment. It was a moment more dangerous than my companions and 
to a lesser extent I realised. I searched my mind for memories of Barbara 
Baynton. Nothing. 
 3 
The pause must have extended almost into the dramatic. Then an association 
came to me with ‘The Drover’s Wife’ and a tramp with a butcher’s knife circling a 
humpy back o’ Bourke one dark night in the 1890s. Just as Patrick White opened 
his mouth to sweep on in utter dismissal of my existence I said, ‘Gruesome.’ 
Mrs Prerauer, Patrick White, Mr Prerauer stared at me. I sliced some veal on my 
plate. When I looked up to chew, Mr Prerauer (who I suspect was subtle) had just 
begun to smile, Mrs Prerauer’s astonishment was transforming itself for the 
benefit of Patrick White into angry contempt and his astonishment was 
transforming itself into interest. ‘Quite right,’ he said. Mrs Prerauer’s glance shot 
from one to the other of us as if at a tennis match then she beamed at me. 
Through the rest of the simple meal she kept darting assessing, puzzled glances 
at me and trying to draw me out. But I, who had never really spoken to her, 
never really did so. In this way the rest of the evening passed without incident. 
In a few more weeks I received another astonishing phone call. ‘Hello,’ it said, 
‘this is Manoly Lascaris speaking. Patrick wants you to come to dinner.’ 
Along with everyone else who read or pretended to, I knew who Manoly Lascaris 
was – Patrick White’s … We had not given ‘partner’ its current connotations, it still 
felt like a euphemism for ‘boyfriend’. And ‘boyfriend’ was obviously not right for 
Patrick White’s … They had been together for years. And years. 
‘Oh thank you,’ I replied.  
I was told when and where. 
I had accepted in trepidation: I knew I must inevitably disappoint. With everyone 
else who read or pretended to, I knew next to nothing about Australian literature 
and I could not be witty and tell anecdotes in the approved theatre bound manner 
 4 
of the era and I was dreadfully shy. Silence: brooding, calculating, critical, satiric 
was my medium and defence. Most people took me for ‘quiet’. And I was a good 
audience. He though, would see through me at once. Still, one could not refuse 
the challenge. 
In the intervening ten days I fantasised about coming into my own, Patrick’s 
beautiful house, the wonderful food and the abundant gin or vodka and really 
good wine, the dazzling company, my entrée into a world – a world where I would 
take my place. I would no doubt move into the Eastern suburbs. 
I drove. With every intention of getting stonkered, I drove. We did in those days.  
I took a bottle of Pouilly Fumé I had found in my desperation in David Jones (the 
old George Street store, now gone). It was astonishingly cheap. Maybe it was too 
old, maybe it was not a good wine, maybe they had mispriced it (things were 
laxer then) most likely it had sneaked in during a hiatus in our tariff restrictions. 
I climbed the steps in the dark, Centennial Park whispering and rustling as if to 
footfalls behind me. I noted that I could take refuge in it if things got completely 
awful. 
After a while the door was opened and Manoly in almost ludicrously heavy black 
framed glasses stood there inspecting me. I explained myself and he silently 
stood aside to let me enter.  
I entered a room full of people. There was another inspection. Behind me Manoly 
said, ‘Patrick’s in the kitchen. Would you like a drink?’ 
‘Oh yes.’ 
 5 
Someone smiled at my tone and went back to her conversation.  
I handed my wine over; it was instantly whisked away. 
I settled myself near someone about my own age who I knew was blossoming in 
the theatre. Maybe Patrick had invited me to keep him company. His parents 
were also there, a man of the opera, a woman of the theatre, a young lawyer and 
a not young art dealer. I knew I could hide in the crowd. Manoly pushed a drink 
into my hand. Red wine. Ugh. There were those black olives sweating their oil in a 
crude dish and taramasalata waiting to be scooped up on rags of that Lebanese 
bread stuff. I settled for anorexia and the red wine (it was quite rough to my 
taste but what did I know and poured from a crude jug). 
The first of my fantasies had hit the dust. I had dreamt of being in a kind of 
Hollywood art deco interior, all shining chrome, table lamps throwing soft lights 
up, bare wood floors focussed by a striking rug, pictures (perhaps idealised 
portraits of the occupants, a major Margaret Preston, a Nolan to show how they 
knew) with their own little neon lamps craning to get a better look at what they 
lit, Lalique vases holding sprays of cymbidium orchids, Chinese planters holding 
cyclamen (these were not yet tiresome), cocktails – martinis catching the 
wonderful lights.  
He was ahead of the hippy earthy pack, I’ll say that for him. Soon everyone was 
to be pouring rough red (which these days would not seem rough at all) from 
earthy jugs into earthy goblets. Alienated though I already was, further years 
deeper in the clayey wilderness were ahead of me. 
The parents of the promising young man in the theatre spoke to me in lieu of 
him. I had almost begun to forget myself in their kindly interest (obviously they 
were the only ones in the room who would forgive me for being such a nonentity) 
 6 
and the first effects of the wine when Patrick White swept enormous into the 
room oven-mitted hands clasping a smoking trough of something. He threw it 
onto the table, ordered Manoly to seat us and charged off. 
Manoly (for a moment I saw him as a dutiful but potentially vicious Border Collie 
– not a good omen for my future behaviour) quickly fussed us to our places. I 
was at the bottom of the table on his left. Mercifully the parents of the young 
man of the theatre were next and opposite to me. The man of the opera was next 
to the mother; he had a gentle, bemused, benevolent glow in his eye.  
Patrick was back with a glass of whisky and a ferocious demeanour. Fortunately, 
by now the red wine I had been skolling had made me bold: I wanted to laugh. 
However the appalling mess he served wiped any inclination to smile off my face. 
I could not eat it. It was all sorts of dissolving things swimming in oil – were 
those carrots? No capsicum. That is eggplant. Hunks of onion. A clove of garlic 
surfaced and sank again. More of those bloody black olives. Oregano billowed off 
the surface of the ugly terracotta bowl to further nauseating effect.  
Where were the slices of boiled egg, the caviar served in crystal bowls nestling in 
ice, their tiny silver spoons gleaming in the candlelight? Where was the soft white 
bread roll from Schlederer’s Bakery, the curl of fragrant fresh butter, the 
miraculously thin slice of lemon?  
A wooden platter on which sat a loaf and its slices was thrust at me. I took a slice 
to help me to pretend to eat the other thing. Sawdust is no doubt softer. I think it 
was made out of corn cobs pressed once all the kernels had been eaten then not 
finely ground pumice sprinkled on top. Patrick glared at us to see who was not 
eating. Everyone was trying. The silence was monumental. ‘Very nice,’ I 
contributed and manfully demonstrated lifting a fork to my mouth. Then I took a 
tiny bite of the cornboard. There was no butter, presumably as a concession to 
 7 
the oil sliding around our plates. ‘Is it a Greek dish?’ the mother of the young 
man of the theatre inquired, smiling at Manoly. 
Oh well, there were two of us.  
Others bent over their penance with the self-absorbed smiles of the supercilious.  
I knew I was suburban. So I took a deep draught of the wine. I wished he would 
bring on another – a white. Surely he would serve something that went with 
white after this? Something delicate. Pheasant maybe, if pheasant was delicate – 
didn’t they have to hang it or something? Please god, not pheasant then. 
He continued to sip whisky and glare. Then he hoed into the stuff, dentures 
clacking. I averted my attention. Manoly was smiling at me in what I took to be a 
malicious manner.  
The next I knew there was another commotion. Act I was rung down with cries 
of, ‘Superb!’ ‘Real food!’ ‘I could feel it doing me good.’ This latter earned the 
woman of the theatre a sharp glance from the mineral blue eyes but she played 
out her tone (whatever it had been) resolutely. The terracotta bowls and trough 
were whisked away. More wine was poured. I asked for white. 
The second course was a beef daube and edible though there were not really 
enough potatoes (boiled whole in their skins). My request for white had been 
patently overlooked. Anyway I enjoyed the daube. It strengthened me and I was 
able to be more part of the occasion. 
The whisky must have made its way to White’s limbic system for he was now 
waving his earthy goblet and interrogating in order to muster subject matter for 
his diatribe. 
 8 
It became clear to me what the dinner was about: audience. We were merely an 
audience for the Sybil of Centennial Park. I felt hugely relieved.  
‘And I suppose you’ve feeding that woman after her performances?’ he screeched 
at the man of the opera. 
‘Yes, Patrick. Dame Joan has kindly consented to come over for supper after a 
performance or two. We keep it very simple, as you know. She wants to relax 
after a – ‘ 
‘Saw her in The Carmelites, didn’t we Manoly?’ 
‘Yes Patrick.’ 
‘Dreadful.  Utterly unconvincing. The complacency!’ 
I cannot convey in print what he made of that word. In general if might be noted 
that he would have been a great singer himself, if he could sing. In any case he 
did not let his unfortunate voice stop him from performing miracles of expression.  
I laughed for sheer pleasure at his theatricality, his audacity, his outrageousness. 
He glanced me into submission. ‘I was not moved, not for a moment. How could I 
be if I were not convinced?’ 
He did a wonderful thing with ‘convinced’ also. Somewhere in it there was a 
snake hissing. Possibly Satan as he had been when he approached Eve.  
‘A Strathfield housewife in a church hall production. No understanding.’ 
 9 
‘I think she’s a Darling Point girl, Patrick,’ the young lawyer said. 
‘I thought it was Vaucluse – it’s somewhere in the Eastern Suburbs, maybe Point 
Piper but I don’t think so.’ 
These examples of literal mindedness were – it was something stronger than 
dismissed yet milder than obliterated – intensely overlooked with a sweep of the 
pale blue eyes.  
‘A Protestant dressing up as a Carmelite for a fancy dress dance.’ (Again, no 
alphabet could convey what he did with that final word). 
‘I think she might be Catholic, Patrick.’ 
‘The Singing Housewife!’  
‘Now Patrick,’ the man of the opera gently intoned. 
‘She’d be nothing without him.’ Here followed an entirely unrepeatable analysis of 
Richard Bonynge, about whom White appeared to know everything. He related 
Bonynge’s breeding and personality to his work in music. To my young ears it 
was brilliant beyond crediting. I was ready to sit at the feet forever. 
However this was not to be. 
Before dessert and after Richard Bonynge Bob Hawke was circumspectly 
quartered. 
 10 
Dessert was a clafoutis aux pommes, a good contrast to what had preceded but 
dry and the apples (Granny Smith) far too tart. Mercifully no wine was served 
with it. 
We adjourned to the lounge for Act III
White had returned to whisky. I was planning my escape, considering whether I 
could send a note rather than ring to thank them.  
‘And you, young man, we hear you are lectured by Professor Kramer.’ 
I admitted that I was in one of her tutorials. But hastened to add there was 
another tutor as well. My mind had reeled over the possibilities of saying 
something clever about her but nothing arrived.  
Everyone was staring at me; more was required. 
‘She plays her game very subtly.’ Something had arrived. I had no idea what I 
meant. 
‘Aha! That is not our impression. Professor Kramer,’ he stated. 
I knew I had nothing further to add. 
‘She’s a friend of James McAuley,’ the woman of the theatre saved me. 
‘They‘re all in it together, the profupials!’ 
 11 
‘The profupials’, was repeated by several with those spirit annihilating trod-the- 
boards laughs. The father of the boy wonder of the Australian Theatre politely 
wagged his head in distant tribute to amusement. 
I was desperate to get away. 
The Platonic monologue had turned on Professor A D Hope whose work I found 
repulsive but I was too far gone in fear that something further would be required 
of my inadequacy to enjoy the butchery … ‘The greatest eighteenth century writer 
working in the twentieth. Huh!’ Which had become careless. Something had gone 
terribly wrong with the evening.  
I had to move. I rose to examine the paintings. 
These were, my secret inner voice suggested, ‘dreary’ (this word was much used 
in those days by those who wished to be smart). I recognised a Godfrey Miller, a 
Ian Fairweather, both either beyond me or too desperately seeking what would 
forever evade him in the case of the former or addled in the latter. To my horror I 
found White standing beside me. ‘What do you think?’ he demanded. 
‘Patrick (I took that risk), I must go.’ 
‘Quite right,’ he said for the second time to me, only this time I was not at all 
sure of the tone. 
As I was traversing the huge stage of the lounge room Manoly entered from the 
wings bearing a J C Williamsons wooden tray laden with the accustomed glazed 
muddy vessels. He paused wonderfully to take in my departure before going to a 
sideboard to lay the salving jugs and chalices down. ‘Oh, you are not leaving? So 
soon.’ He thus turned the production into The Mikado with its hints of real 
 12 
execution in most unpleasant manners. ‘We are all just about to have tea. Coffee 
is so bad for you. Patrick forbids it.’ 
‘Quite right,’ I said. And quickly to the repertory ensemble poised to carry on the 
real drama after the necessary bit player had ushered himself off, ‘Good night, it’s 
been lovely talking to you.’ 
I will regret that for the rest of my life.  
‘Did you have a coat?’ Patrick demanded of me as I was about to enter the dark 
wing from which no player returns. 
‘I’m wearing it.’ 
‘It’s cold out there.’ 
Not as cold as in here, my inner voice said. 
I shut the front door behind me. 
I heard a peel of laughter. A concerted stagy bellow as I picked my way down the 
testing front path to the gate. 
I stopped before I got into my car to breathe the sweet air of freedom. A tang of 
Centennial Park hit my nostrils. The silence of the park prevailed over the 
occasional distant murmur of car, the roar of a bus. I longed to wander towards 
its unknowable depths to render null the awful fool I had made of myself, to 
immerse myself in sweet oblivion. The key found the lock. 
 13 
To my horror I heard Manoly’s voice. Patrick would like me to come to dinner, 
again. 
I heard my own go high and light as I lied, ‘I would love to.’ 
During the following days I racked my mind for excuses. None would be more 
than that; I had to go, ‘chickening out’ was against my religion. But I promised 
myself that this would be the last time.  
I was steeled for the ordeal but what would I take? It was also against my 
religion to turn up empty-handed. And I had to make a special effort in order to 
compensate for my inadequacy and awkwardness. There was no more French 
wine at ridiculously cheap prices in D Js, I believed flowers were an encumbrance 
to hosts, the Manoly-Whites did not seem chocolate type of people though one of 
those wooden boxes from Personality Chocolates might be presentable – but no, I 
could feel his contempt … Oh, I’d just take a reasonably expensive bottle of red. 
Then I remembered Bill’s Charcuterie in Miller Street – dare I? Living way over 
there in Centennial Park they had probably not sampled his delicacies though 
they would have heard of him. I bought a slice of his duck liver pâté and one of 
his pâté de campagne. They looked meagre so I bought a pot of his béarnaise 
sauce for them too.  
Thus armed, I trod up the treacherous path.  
It was another cold night. The dogs barked out the back. I smiled at the memory 
of a girl complaining in a tutorial about the dogs in … was it The Solid Mandala
Riders in the Chariot? licking their balls or something. The tutors had exchanged 
smiles. Someone else had exclaimed, ‘But Angela, that’s what dogs do!’ Angela 
had thought it ‘unnecessary’. 
 14 
The door was open and there was the eternal Manoly tacitly snickering. I was 
dressed in a rather dramatic Army Stores navy trench coat. He made sure he led 
me in for inspection before helping me to divest myself of my interest. Patrick 
was waiting, semi reclined on the couch, bailed up in a huge armchair was a late 
middle-aged woman. She was staring into some mystery or torment.  
‘Ah, you’re amongst us again,’ Patrick said, ‘have you been drafted?’ 
No, my name hadn’t been drawn in the ballot to go to Vietnam, I apologised. 
‘Well Phillip is among us to escape it.’ Phillip, it transpired, was a draft-dodging 
American of literary training.  
The nearly elderly woman was Christina Stead. I was cursing myself for not 
having read The Man who Loved Children.  
She looked like an elderly zoo lion who would have been rather mangy but for the 
fact he had had his mane severely trimmed and very tightly permed. It was 
evident he had never accustomed himself to captivity and though possibly 
arthritic would crouch and spring when it was least expected. She had just 
finished a whisky and clearly wanted another. Manoly saw to it and to Patrick’s. I 
was again given wine (red also again) and my offerings whisked away. 
Patrick was going on about War. His war. The desert, the boredom, being straffed 
by the Wadi something or another. Manoly came in with plates with things on 
them. ‘We’re bivouacking,’ he said. I noticed my pâté de campagne on one of 
them. 
Miss Stead said, ‘No thank you, not at the moment,’ when offered something 
(black olives needless to say, those stupid dolmades, salami and my contribution 
 15 
which were apparently to be aligned with slices of that bread). Her voice was 
clear, precise and her very Australian accent in the process of becoming 
antiquated. She deliberately lit a cigarette then drank. I am sorry to say I cannot 
remember all that she said that night but will carry to my grave an impression of 
huge strength of some very unusual kind and of a regard which was without 
compassion or malice, neither gimlet, calculating nor unfocussed; I Am a Camera 
comes to mind. Christina Stead was the antithesis of whimsical and self- 
regarding. She was not silent, she was not loquacious, she did her duty by the 
conversation and believe me her clear and strong voice betrayed no doubt as to 
her opinions. I was terrified Patrick would demand what I thought of The Man 
Who … or even if it were studied in the University. Girls of my acquaintance had 
been led to read it by their High School English Honours teachers. Several, who 
knew my home life, had told me I ought to read it. The tone in their voice made 
the prospect of the book’s revelations terrifying to me and when I had peeped 
between its covers I had found its style daunting. As was its author. 
Phillip, unlike the greasy theatricals, was unimpressed by being in the Presence. 
He chatted on, blithely. He was very nice in his impossible innocent American 
manner. 
The other guests were the Duttons, over from Adelaide. Geoff was all gleaming 
with some joy he was ill-equipped to disguise, Nin was not. She was restless and 
edgy. She was wonderful to look at it; the epitome of forties beauty and she 
spoke with warmth and vivacity. I was very sorry she was so unhappy.  
Despite being denied the gin or vodka I craved, I got intoxicated on the pre 
dinner glass of red (it was glasses this time; the dinner service was again earthy 
but smooth this time – Arabia ware I would guess, popular at the time). I was 
fine (that is to say I was dull and polite) through the soup (celery with which I 
was allowed a white) but by the time the rabbit (!) was borne in (au moutarde 
 16 
and garlic, garlic, garlicky served with these coarse large white boiled bean things 
– the Manoly-Whites could not, it would seem, abide a fine texture) I was away. 
Mrs Dutton became a puma about to slice someone’s face open with her claws 
and obviously it would not be the permed lion’s, nor the Sage of Centennial 
Park’s; Manoly’s defence of sweetness was complete, that left the American and 
me and her husband.  
The wine had lifted my spirits, I was looking again at the paintings glowing from 
the walls. One was of a biplane just hatched from an egg. ‘I love surrealism, don’t 
you?’ I announced. 
Phillip asked what made me say that and I explained. Everyone looked at the 
painting then at me. Phillip asked Miss Stead if it were true she had attended the 
First International Congress of Writers. She nodded and sipped her wine. ‘In 
Paris?’ Miss Stead nodded and sipped her wine. Nin asked her if she were writing 
at the moment and she nodded and sipped her wine. I thought I had heard of the 
First International Congress of Writers – some left wing/Communist thing, they 
were using glasses and plates with textures which weren’t sandy and here I was 
with Christina Stead and Geoffrey Dutton, owner of Sun Books and his lovely, 
elegant vivacious wife and Phillip from America who seemed to be camp and 
Patrick White and his …. Manoly. ‘Isn’t it good Thea Astley won the Miles Franklin 
again?’ I contributed to a lull in this labouring evening. 
The dormant Patrick now erupted, ‘That wicked, back-biting bitch! She was a sure 
thing. Miss Beatrice Davis B A runs the thing. She’s her editor at Angus and 
Robertson’s. She makes sure her horses come in. It’s fixed, it’s fixed! Their tiny 
little sapphic circles run Lily Literature in this state.’ 
‘I thought Thea Astley was married. I met her husband in Adelaide,’ Nin Dutton 
said. She was sitting next to Patrick. She laid her hand across his. 
 17 
I noticed Christina Stead’s gaze take this in, then Geoff Dutton then me. So I 
said, ‘She’s such a sophisticated writer.  Surely she’s the most satiric of our 
writers? She’s brilliant, without being great perhaps, as you are.’ I looked at the 
two greats. Patrick looked mollified, Miss Stead waved a hand as if languidly 
indicating an infinity to her left and sipped her wine. Phillip stared at me. Manoly 
had decided we had finished with the rabbit. 
He returned to the table with photographs. He hovered over me. ‘This is Patrick 
on holiday with Geoffrey on his island,’ he said placing the rather good black and 
white photograph in front of me. It was of Geoff and Patrick with fishing gear. 
They were tanned. Geoffrey looked relaxed and happy, Patrick looked satisfied. 
Manoly’s finger rested on Geoff. I looked at him, I looked at Geoff’s image. ‘Did 
you catch anything?’ I asked Patrick. His pale blue eyes flickered. I smiled up at 
Manoly. Manoly whisked the photograph away. He came back with another, 
framed. It was of a much younger him in army uniform. He placed it in front of 
me. I was puzzled. ‘What a beautiful photograph. Of you,’ I said. ‘Was it taken 
out here?’ ‘Near Alexandria,’ Manoly said and took that photograph away. I knew 
something was going on but I had only dim notions of what.  
Dessert was crêpes suzette. They were not done at the table. Their texture was 
fine and rubbery.  
We adjourned. I asked for a gin and was given brandy. 
‘How has Australia influenced your work?’ Phillip asked Miss Stead. 
‘You ought to be writing! Not running this foolhardy publishing concern,’ Patrick 
plosived at Geoffrey Dutton. ‘It’ll burn you up and take all your money.’ 
 18 
‘I feel Sun Books had an important contribution to make. To Australia. Now is the 
time,’ Geoff replied. 
‘What are you publishing?’ I asked. 
‘Picture books!’ Patrick answered. 
‘There is a market for colourful – creative books, designed by … We have to take 
the opportunity now you can get the colour work done so cheaply in Hong Kong.’ 
‘Leave it to that shyster Gordon Barton! You have your own work to do.’ 
‘Do you feel you missed out on … because you left Australia?’ Phillip persisted 
with Miss Stead. Was he just polite? 
Miss Stead sipped her whisky and appeared to be considering returning her 
conscious attention to this room and perhaps even the question. She did so. ‘I am 
not sure there was anything to miss out on, one always misses out on something 
by being somewhere else. I was somewhere else.’ 
Patrick White said something (no doubt wonderful) in French and Miss Stead 
replied (no doubt wonderfully). Her French sounded very good to me (his had 
not). No doubt she spoke German, Italian and Spanish as well. Hadn’t she been in 
the Spanish Civil War? 
‘Yes but,’ Phillip said, ‘you’re back now. So much must have changed, I wondered 
if … you felt you … Australia – what does Australia have to offer?’ 
The room was intently focussed on this returned expatriate, this near ruin. 
 19 
Miss Stead was not alarmed by attention. Her pale blue furious eyes retained 
their limpid quality. She and Patrick could have been siblings. Blue eyes, furious, 
tall … she was more elemental than he. 
As she appeared not to be answering, Patrick declaimed, ‘One runs but always 
carries this dried sponge of a country with one. It will suck you up (oh that kind 
of sponge) but will fill you with its dull colours and swirling dust (here he 
wheezed) – Opals! Bloody opals with their slimy phosphorescent greens and 
cataract whites, their whorish mauves.’ He appeared to be struggling for breath, 
wildly batted Manoly’s ministrations away, sucked on a whisky and glared at the 
angels listening in their tiers just above the slate tiles of the steep roof. 
‘The Spring tides at Watson’s Bay spoiled me for anything else, perhaps,’ Miss 
Stead announced to Phillip. 
We all sat stunned. 
I felt it was my duty to save the evening.  
‘I know what you mean,’ I worse than dreadfully presumed, ‘you can swim – glide 
over the rocks you have to clamber over and oyster cuts always fester. No-one 
eats them now because you get hepatitis,’ I warned Miss Stead. 
Before she could acknowledge this kindness the Centennial Park geyser blew. ‘We 
know about you!’ he declared. ‘The meat industry.’ 
As it was directed at me I felt obliged to respond in some way. ‘Meat industry’ 
must be some jargon of sophisticates for … it was usually sexual. So I nodded. 
‘Where did you get that wine? The Pouilly Fumé?’ 
 20 
The brandy had given me some kind of clarity. ‘La collection de mon père,’ I said 
and was astonished by the perfection of my school accent. My father had been 
dead for years and I had never known him to drink wine. 
‘Aha! We thought so. And what are they running these days - Shorthorns?’ 
‘They’ve had a bit of trouble in the Gulf Country so they’re trying out Brahman 
crosses.’ I had seen a television program about this so if we were talking about 
the meat industry, perhaps this would do. ‘They’re repulsive,’ I added in case we 
weren’t and it wouldn’t. 
‘They pay for French wine.’ With this asseveration I was more or less dismissed 
though I could see he wanted to add more in the way of the reproachful.  
He turned on Geoff Dutton and his failure to apply himself to the Great Project, 
the nature of which was not revealed. Phillip asked and was informed the time 
was not ripe for revelations and was asked what he intended to do with himself 
while he dallied out the war Downunder.  
Manoly disappeared, to bring in the tea, I hoped. They were talking now of Miles 
Franklin and how she had blossomed at sixteen and her blossoms had thus set for 
the rest of her life. I gathered there was much Patrick approved about her.  
Manoly appeared, not with the tray but with more photos. ‘Sidney Nolan.’ 
‘I know,’ I said though I didn’t. 
‘John Tasker. He directed some of Patrick’s plays.’  
 21 
‘Oh,’ I said. 
‘David Foster.’ 
I examined the photos. They were all the one person and I was in there with 
them. They were a type. I had a revelation – oh, this is what they meant when 
they said ‘s/he’s his type’. I got it. I was Patrick’s type – thin, straight brown hair, 
artisticky and quietish.  
Manoly saw I had got it, took the photos and exited to prepare for his next 
entrance.  
I looked around. All were engaged in Phillip’s defence of his fleeing the draft to 
Australia except Miss Stead. Her steady gaze absorbed me while I came to the 
conclusion that I had been invited to these madmen’s house, not because I had 
hidden, astonishing depths, wonderful potential, was interesting in some way not 
apparent to me but because I was White’s type. She saw, sipped her whisky and 
turned her attention to Phillip at bay. 
The room became squalid; self-possession began chelating in me. 
I went to the kitchen. Manoly was doing his J C Williamsons wooden tray. 
I thanked him. 
He said he would see me out. 
‘Good night!’ I declaimed as I re-entered the lounge. 
 22 
No-one said ‘Oh you’re not going?’ of course, they just stared at me shadowed by 
Manoly.  
Something swept me: I must gain something from this abasing encounter. I 
strode to Miss Stead and aligned one cheek and then another in formal intimacy 
with hers. Her response was expert and maybe terribly kind. I turned and bore 
down on Patrick White. He was glaring ahead then foolishly looked up into my 
face. I kissed him on the forehead and smiling, considered him. His flinty eyes 
kaleidoscoped resolving into velvet softness; mine turned adamantine.  
‘Good night,’ I said to the others as I trod calmly off, shadowed by Manoly. 
As I stepped into the stinging freshness of freedom he called from the doorway, 
‘Patrick finds you a little interesting, he calls you our farouche young friend.’ 
As my feet hit Martin Road I realised I was terribly drunk. I couldn’t drive across 
the Bridge in this state. I walked to my mother’s car and sat in the front 
passenger seat. I couldn’t drive and I feared encountering again the other guests 
as they made their escapes. Then I noticed a gate into the darkness of Centennial 
Park; it was slightly ajar.  
I knew I would pass out soon if I didn’t wake up so I ventured through the gate – 
a walk could only help, even if I had to walk for hours.  
I plunged down a lawn gully into further darkness. The cold intensified and the 
grass began to crackle; frost. I thought the cold would help me to sober up. I was 
shaking. 
I reached the bottom of the gully. There was a huge log. I sat on it and dozed off. 
A noise – a gurgling – brought me back to consciousness. What was it? Moonlight 
 23 
now illuminated the freezing gully. I could still not see the source of the strange 
noise so I got up to search.  
It was a tap of a very old kind and water sparkled and ran whitish with myriad 
tiny bubbles from it. It was the milk of Paradise and I drank. It was wonderfully 
cold and pure. 
It was the only miracle I have ever experienced: I was instantly sober, dreadfully 
tired but clear of sight and steady of hand and foot.  
I made my way out of the gully and drove home. 
In the two days of rage and remorse which followed I decided those two were 
appalling, that they entertained chiefly in order to indulge in Get the Guest, that 
Patrick White was mad and Manoly bad, that Miss Stead had said that thing about 
the Spring tides at Watson’s Bay merely as something to say and that it had been 
rather feeble. 
Over the following years I saw Patrick White several times and we kept our 
distance. The last was on Central Station. He was wearing a light khaki trench 
coat and heading west. It was an odd time of night, nine o’clock.  
Several decades later I read For Love Alone and realised Miss Stead had not been 
rather feeble; the Spring tides at Watson’s Bay probably had unfitted her for life 
elsewhere, though that she had to have. 
© Ian MacNeill 

Monday, September 13, 2010

THE WAY WE WERE - three Australian novelists





THEY WAY WE WERE: THREE AUSTRALIAN NOVELISTS

The Basking Shark in Parsley Bay: the Style of Christina Stead

There is a curious moment in For Love Alone
"Come for a swim?" she asked her brother Lance.
'Too tired,' he said. "Don't swim alone, and look out, there are rays and Portuguese-man-of wars about."
"I'll stay in the light. You come and look-out."
"Not on your tintype."
Her father, sitting on a stone bench in the garden, slapping mosquitoes, said, "Have you got a look-out?"
"You come and watch," she said.
"Nuh," said he. "Too tired. Been making Kitty's hope chest all the afternoon. More hope than chest."
Lance from behind the door said: "Hmff," disgustedly.
"Lance doesn't care for women," laughed the father in his soft voice.
"Really!" cried Teresa. "Really! Doesn't he? Oh no!"
The father laughed. Teresa dropped her towel on the steps and splashed into the water; it was so still that the splash could be heard all over the bay.
"Not out of the lights," called her father. "I saw a large basking shark up Parsley Bay yesterday." The basking shark was pale, changing colour with the bottom and all but invisible.


Christina Stead was not given to inaccuracies and was very interested in marine biology – which is perhaps not surprising when we consider David G Stead was her father. Yet here we have a basking shark 'changing colour with the bottom and all but invisible' in Parsley Bay.

Teresa, the heroine of For Love Alone, is based on Stead and her experiences. Stead's need to render them seems the basis of her literary endeavour to a remarkable degree. Many of her characters and their situations were recognised by her friends and family; they often felt the resemblances painfully true.

Teresa had been to a wedding in Neutral Bay. It was an extremely hot day in Sydney, around Christmas time when the 'spring' tides (it is actually summer) cover beaches and wash over paths where one is accustomed to tread. The spring tides effect a magical transformation – one can glide through the water over rough paths along which one has had to pick one's way.

Teresa's journey home from the wedding in Neutral Bay on the other side of Sydney Harbour has included a stopover at her aunt's and cousin's who live a couple of bays closer to the city than Teresa's home. From their place she has had to climb a steep hill to descend via the byways only a local could know to reach her home, which like the day, the wedding reception and her aunt's home seethes with elan obliterating heat, with frustration, desperation, poverty and aspiration. The bride, grief stricken at her own wedding had begged Teresa, whom she hardly knows, not to think too badly of her for sinking to this marriage; the aunt holds Teresa's cousin Anne in vassalage so that she longs to escape into marriage – with anyone. The spring tides have washed their enchantment right up to Teresa's lawn; she must partake of what relief they can offer.        

It is Sydney as it was up until the eighties and Depression Sydney in particular – determinedly Anglo-Celtic, desperately respectable and deeply sympathetic to good form yet prone to social defiance, threatened by nature and subject to magical transformations which threaten to envelop.

Teresa swims. Her splash can be heard all over the bay. Many are listening. She survives (sting) rays and Portuguese man-of-wars (a stinging jelly fish) and of course the basking shark which in any case could offer no threat because it is according to David G Stead harmless to all but 'small pelagic living things'.

What is this fantastic creature doing lazing about in Stead's vigorous sweep of fictionalised documentary narrative?

Stead's style exhausts her readers: it is relentlessly intense and particular. Seemingly raw in its reflection of 'reality', it insists upon her unsentimental clarity of vision.

For vision it is. This may or may not have actually happened to the young Stead like this but it is true in the literary sense: psychologically, socially, philosophically, historically, humanly, poetically. Stead's vision is faithful to a larger sphere than the autobiographical. Actual though they may have been, Stead's characters and their situations are a product of her mind, that mind which would not or could not seek comfort in the fantasised or ideal but which recorded for her readers a time, a place, characters and a situation – this is what it is, she says. What she gives us, her vision, is as unameliorated as it may be. Stead's insistence on the recording of character and situation can overwhelm her reader. Her unsentimentality and relentless particularising inspire awe but blear our attention. It is as if Stead had more pressing needs and higher goals than to inform and entertain us.

The Leftists of this period (and Stead was one) favoured 'realism' and this quality no doubt assisted Stead's publishing career, nevertheless the style is the woman. Her style is insistent in its determination to give more than a verisimilitude. Stead captures the surges, the backwashes, eddies, the tumults and flatnesses of situations and represents these phenomena in all their inevitable effect. Dialogue plays a big part in her efforts to represent her vision; it is sometimes laboured. While the thoughts, both spoken and unspoken, of her characters are registered in close texture, too often they partake of the dialectic so that Stead's dialogue lies heavily on the page and it is too often framed with verbs ('laughed the father') which are little more than devices of direct speech and adverbs such as 'disgustedly' (which adds very little to Lance's 'Hmff'). Stead's flow of detail is relatively unmediated in terms of narrative thrust (compare For Love Alone with Emma for example; her narrative drives neither towards reader-satisfying climax nor resolution) but it and her dialogue capture as no history ever has how it was to be these people and what that time did to them.

Of course Teresa's father would have disparaged the comeliness and therefore the marriageability of her sister Kitty because he was, in his straitened circumstances, desperate to get rid of her but also keen to keep her allure for himself. Similarly he disparages his son's masculinity by implying he might be homosexual, projecting that enticing possibility onto him. This is Sydney, the Depression, Australia, fatherhood and masculinity as it was then and perhaps universally is. It is also the theme of For Love Alone (wonderfully paradoxical title): marriage for women.

Teresa, exhausted and enchanted, manages to be aloof from this situation and to graciously humour her father as Stead herself must have done to the point of madness. Stead hated her father. Her rage against him drives her great novel The Man Who Loved Children. Perhaps drove her.

Why would Teresa's father warn her against a basking shark and why would Stead's authorial voice take up the nonsense of this threat and turn it into a rare moment in her prose – a recoiling from the unmitigated rendition of her characters' realities?

Watson's Bay (the first bay inside the great heads which protect the magnificent Sydney Harbour, the point of arrival and retreat from this edge of empire, redolent of marine adventure and disaster and in those days home to fisher people) is on this night enchanted with the great tide gently spilling across the shore and invading its sandstone littoral. So perhaps the great, colour changing and all but invisible shark is part of that enchantment. Though the spring tides do happen and this basking shark does not.

Is Stead visiting an obvious and foolish mistake upon the distinguished marine biologist her father (clearly the progenitor of her character, Teresa's father) in order to humiliate him? Is it a deliberate or an unconscious thrust into his reputation? Has Stead herself made a mistake, momentarily confusing a basking shark with the slow, also harmless (and very much smaller) carpet shark, species of which waggle their variegated ways across the bottom of the bays of Sydney Harbour? Or is the father character confident of his daughter's ignorance of sharks and in his ever sly, mocking and ambiguous manner nevertheless expressing a genuine concern for her safety? Though swimming where there is light is not going to save her (Teresa herself seems to believe a look-out might secure her) from attack by a (say, whaler) shark, a sting from a Portuguese man-of-war or from treading on a ray which might then also sting her dreadfully.

Is the point of this exchange that these men should have protected this woman or that these men are denying this woman a little refreshing adventure? Stead herself might have denied there was any general point implicit in this situation; she would have been annoyed by and vigorously resisted the idea that in this kind of way men oppress women. She was not in her fiction a propagandist and in her later life would brook no attacks on 'the patriarchy'. Yet we often do discern the universal or at least general in her vividly realised scenes and something else besides, something beyond the literal seems to be heightening their impact.

Is the basking shark an uncharacteristic moment in which Stead wishes to sensationalise her scene, maybe with her American readership in mind?

Stead knew her father's work very well. In 1906 David Stead had written of the basking shark 'The Basking Shark … attains huge dimensions and is one of the largest fishes existing, reaching a length of forty feet' and in 1963 somewhat unscientifically by today's standards, 'Apart from the verbal records given to me by seafaring men as to the occurrence of this shark in Australian waters, on three occasions ships' captains have reported to me that they have met with a "sleeper", or "sleeping", shark floating motionless at the surface of the ocean between Sydney and the New Zealand coast’. Other authorities are dubious about its existence in the South Pacific.

His daughter, the novelist is, with a high lack of the characteristic, fanciful on this subject. It seems likely then that the shark is not literal. It is a symbol swum from Christina's Stead's unconscious emerging as an absurdity which gives one pause.

The context is the necessity and the dreadfulness of marriage for women (the name of the bride is, terrifyingly enough, 'Malfi'). Teresa is being warned about something, to stay in the light, close to home. She needs a man to watch over her; neither father nor brother will do so and even if they did the light will do her little good for the shark is 'all but invisible'. Its camouflage is infinite, it can be anywhere and probably unnoticed. What can it be? It prowls or glides beneath in its wondrously changing colours. It is a shape, barely detectable. It seems to be a threat yet it is in a Bay called Parsley – one of the two herbs used regularly by Australian cooks of that time (the other being mint). 'Parsley' suggests the most ordinary of domestic settings. The historical Parsley Bay was more respectable than Watsons Bay. Is Stead's image of the basking shark in Parsley Bay one of the horror which glides beneath family homes, beneath the acceptable? The rest of her work and her life substantiate this interpretation. Is Teresa's father, dreadful in his domesticity, making this point in some unconscious symbolic way? Parsley, in the old wives tales of Sydney, was supposed to protect against pregnancy. Is the basking shark the very threat of a husband, of pregnancy? Maybe the most terrible thing about it is that it at any moment might, all forty feet of it, cease to bask.

Parsley Bay seems charming in its safeness yet that is where the basking shark was seen – or where Teresa's father claims to have seen it (one need not necessarily believe him, prone to teasing his children as he is).

Or does the warning come from the author herself? For it is she who has offered a comment on the shark's nature. Why would she need to mention this creature's near invisibility? It devours. It is huge. It is infinitely various. To risk a cliché of post modern commentary, is Stead imaging her own gift? Is the basking shark in Parsley Bay a trope for her art, an astonishment in this confined circumstance, ever changing with its absorption of context? It is submerged, in touch with the depths, glimpsed only as a shape and very frightening in its unknowableness.

The basking shark might then be the shape of the devouring tendency of Stead's art. We can only glimpse its defining and 'all but invisible' form which alerts us to its context by its responsiveness to that context. Think of the inexorable flight of the anecdote which has taken us from the almost unbearable heat of the wedding reception in Neutral Bay with its 'concupiscent fever' to the stifling home Aunt Bea shares with her daughter Anne in Rose Bay (it is a rented room) to Watson's Bay transfigured by a spring tide where a father is reluctantly preparing for the possibility of one of his daughter's marriage.

Are its devouring and transforming qualities alone those which make it dangerous?

The basking shark, we might also consider, is pale, as was the knight in 'La Belle Dame sans Merci'. Chapter 24 of For Love Alone is titled "So Haggard and So Woebegone". Stead's mind was formed by English Literature in a way that few under sixty are now able to recognise. A young man who loves Teresa cries out to her in this chapter, "Yes, what do you care? … You're so pale and beautifully distracted, you're like a woman out of Shakespeare". Teresa only smiles at him. She is la belle dame and the knight 'palely loitering'. She must escape Australia. And thereby find a way past marriage.

Stead devoured her material - her life and that of others - in order to give it shape. Her memories were her imagination. Her detail is blindingly bright (she was very interested in the work of Virginia Woolf, she who wished to be free of the need for plot), she presses her readers to see and feel beyond the delight and horror of anecdote, to immerse themselves in the circumstances and interior life of her characters, to observe their actions and reactions thus (Stead's anecdote proliferates) unfolding. For all her insistence on the particular, her propensity for ramification – in the end because of this - Stead is able to give a sense of scale, of a – let us say tragic - force operating in the world which thwarts and frustrates and destroys people struggling for fulfilment. This prosaic tragic force is made up in no small part of the social conventions and institutions which other novelists endorse even while revealing their destructive power (think of marriage and Anna Karenina). As for the rest – we are the agents of our own undoing. Christina Stead's unflinching gaze at that process makes us squirm and start. 'Basking' in Parsley Bay may suggest complacency; Christina Stead hardly needed warning against that. But most of all, amongst the obsessive flow of her realities, the basking shark is a poetic presence, a transfiguring syncretic. Stead thus offers a sense of a higher vision than that of the mundane, the sordid - one which embraces it and makes it poignant, fabulous.

Christina Stead attracted a wide international readership who venerated her achievement. No writer was truer to her vision and she had the gift to astonish.



The Woman on the Beach: Thea Astley

It was typical of Thea Astley that she wrote about our nearest neighbours whom we consider of no significance and did our best to ignore. In Beachmasters she gives us a rebellion against a French/British ‘condominium’ administration on an island called ‘Kristi’. The name is vaguely associative of Espiritu Santo in Vanuatu; the French/English administration strengthens this association though the independence struggle also alludes to that other very close neighbour New Caledonia, a French ‘possession’. France and Britain allowed the New Hebrides to become the independent nation of Vanuatu in 1980. Beachmasters was published in 1985.

Let us move to Serua Point on Kristi where people have fled from the not very great terrors of a local resistance event.

Cordingley could only goggle at his wife with a marvelling disgust.

They were not the first on the beach at Serua Point. A score of islanders were squatting fatalistically on the sand, simply gaping into a seascape that held less threat than the land at their backs.

Cordingley is the British Resident Agent and his wife is Belle and she is worth marvelling at (‘disgust’ is his limitation). In the following ten small pages Astley captures this colonial world, the immediate situation, them, other Europeans, Chinese traders and the Islanders whose fatalism guarantees the subsiding of the rebellion. Those ten pages are exciting, hilarious, satiric, poignant and true, for Astley’s focus is constantly shifting, wide and deep. There are few ten small pages in English literature which give us so much.

Thea Astley won the Miles Franklin more often than anyone else but some people suggested Angus and Robertson’s Editor Beatrice Davis should step down from the Miles Franklin selection committee because it didn’t look good when Astley, whom they published, won it so often (four times over nearly forty years). Davis dismissed this notion: she was above such considerations. Anyway, Astley’s Drylands won the Miles Franklin (in 2000 with Kim Scott’s Benang) long after Angus and Robertson’s and Beatrice Davis had ceased to be players. She was not entirely a comfortable favourite, Thea Astley, she made people slightly uneasy, even though she was so funny. They complained, But why must she write like that? And there was that mordant glance.

Like Beatrice Davis, Astley belonged to that preceding era when self-assurance was admired (it easily became arrogance), when a writer could confidently invoke a culture, a range of referents and not feel s/he was threatening, puzzling or god forbid turning off her readers. Astley could quote from the Schubert lieder in German, or Rilke or give us a French phrase or sentence or two (as could Helen Garner of the following generation) in the expectation that we would read on in our ignorance, look it up or ask someone to explain it. Astley went further, she freely invoked a world of sophisticated experience, knowledge, wisdom. And it often came from overseas. She was confidently and inevitably, given Australia, defiantly worldly. Yet she never fled these shores in search of what they could not provide – the higher culture, greater refinement, a trust in the imaginative, a wonder at the original. The last most of all. Astley made all of that her own through literature -

Belle and her damn bomb-shells. There’d been the time … he lolled heavily under the fringe of the burao trees and dragged his handkerchief over his blazing face … that time she’d quoted that bit of Samuel Johnson (Christ! None of them had even heard of Samuel Johnson, probably thought she was having a crack at Lyndon B.!) … something about dogs in their doggy world … and the Resident Commissioner droll behind rimless glasses because he was a bit of a books man too, hanging on her words, waiting for it, and she’d gone on about a pair of copulating terriers at a Washington garden party, imagine my dears, dogs in their doggy world at a Nuremberg rally might have changed the course of history …

and insight. She saw and induced. This was why she made people uneasy. How could she know that? they worried, knowing she knew.

Astley was a teacher, high school and university. She taught and she wrote until she retired then she wrote and talked very successfully. Always make them laugh was one of her public presentation principles. She was not afraid to talk on a boat sloughing through the algae and mangrove mud weighted waters of the Brisbane River or at rail stops along an improbable Queensland narrow-gauge railway line. She told them how they were wrecking the land. And they were developers and Queensland farmers. And she made them laugh. She made them laugh at Byron Bay a couple of weeks before she died. It was a wonderful story garnered from a ‘cattle class’ coach trip to see something of America. The story embraced poor black people and not having husbands and how the driver should get the black woman without a seat a husband and some old white woman offering hers. It was about democracy and solidarity and generosity and humour of course. Astley did the voices. Her own was post war, educated Queensland, deliberately uncultured, deliberate. She moved to Byron Bay to be near her son after her husband died. How are you finding it? she was asked. Now this question was put to the supposedly caustic Astley about the pseudo hippy, eighties rich, post glam, nouveau boho, smart backpackerier, Bali-sophisticated Byron Bay, ‘Oh it’s like Gladesville or something,’ she replied deliberately.

Astley could see where people lived in their spirits. Her prose was inflected with the figurative, the language of the unconscious, of myths and dreams. There was always a poet pressing this woman determined on the prosaic. She was accused of stretching credulity with scenes such as the fight to death by men with horns strapped on their heads. Perhaps it was more than that she knew North Queensland better than her critics; perhaps it was also a trope. She was not so much attracted to the bizarre as unafraid of what it said. Her style was not only complex in its reaching out to ensnare complex reality in few words (she is the antithesis of a prolix writer) but it was also vivid for she saw vividly.

His dream took him back to that embassy party and the dramatics of his wife, younger, prettier, her hair swinging in the blunt bob that was too schoolgirlish, her round face with its innocent high colour totally giving the lie to the outrageousness of her utterances. Only this time, the dream women were crowding her begging for more, their faces drawn into long bird-like looks of greed as Belle fluttered among them dashing obscenities with the guilelessness of her face unmarked by the prurience of her stories …


Astley not only gives us Belle’s winning shtick but what makes it winning – the needs of others – in this case female repression. If Astley was a feminist, she did not spare women by denying them their fallible humanity. But what makes her not caustic is her warmth, her unsentimental compassion. She turned her empathy to the despair of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders with what might have been considered an almost obsessive concern if it had not proved so just. She gave us Palm Island before it gave us itself. Her sceptical gaze embraces the unhappiness of those living in disaffection because the mores of their time and place offend their senses of decency and justice a she herself was so offended. Her sympathies were all for the underdog. Her locale is Australian (represented on this beach by ‘the Bipis’, Mr and ‘Misis’ B P, that company’s reps on Kristi, loathed by the diplomatic corps because they are so at home in this rough world where exploitation is the key signature). Astley was drawn to the tropics where the greeds are forced into indolent expressions and roughly cast in crude hues, where striving goodness cannot be starched and savagery so often prevails in the knowledge that civilisation and its rules are far away – well, in Brisbane in any case. Her readers often did not want to believe this was their country or people could behave like that but.

She gives us the innerscapes with wonderful economy and she revels in action; her novels are filled with drama and excitement: fights and hysteria, burnings and explosions.

Cordingley, using Belle’s arm as a kind of tiller, began pushing her with the other European refugees through the ranks of black flesh towards the top of the ramp. Flesh parted for the gavman man. Then there was a massive grinding and scraping as the Eudora shoved its ramp up the beach. The world was chocolate and white. Missionary Lampton from Thresher Bay became unhinged. ‘Back!’ he screamed, his hands in a triangle of prayer. ‘Back! Let the women through first!’ His voice was a thin high-pitched stream of word wings as his lean fanatic body went under the waves off his flock. ‘Pipol Trinitas! Pipol Malua!’ The feathers were plucked from the syllables in a frenzied rush of money-bag rattling Asiatic merchants, who, swinging satchels vigorously like clubs, cut a clear-way for themselves straight through and on to the landing barge.

Belle laughed at the outrageousness of it.

Astley loved place, understood how people might belong to the land rather than own it (‘like Gladesville or something’). Away from the beach at Serua Point the novel’s principal character, Gavi, is coming to terms with how

It’s right we go,’ the boy said without preamble. ‘I’ve been thinking about it. It’s right. I’m sorry about you and maman, but it is right. It is time. Maybe when I’m older I can come back. If the island will have me. When I’ve learned to – well – have myself.’

The French are deporting him, a thirteen year old, for his miserable, hapless part in the rebellion.

Cordingley escapes from the beach, emerging from his panic stricken flight and clownish behaviour with the appearance of more than dignity -

Cordingley sat very straight near the stern, his blood-streaked face turned into the sun.
‘Turned nasty did it?’ the First Secretary asked, looking admiringly at the cut across Cordingley’s forehead.
Cordingley floated a wisp of a smile.
‘Nothing,’ he said, ‘I couldn’t handle.’        

Belle is still on the beach.

As the Eurydice headed west down the Channel, out to the heavy waters between Kristi and Trinitas, those who were near the rails began a relieved waving to the crowd still on the beach. Cordingley could see Belle remove her neck-scarf and trail it in the wind. It was baited with a kind of regretful memory. To his vast surprise he found himself waving, too, his arm lifting involuntarily, and to his further amazement, the people left on shore, mainly black now, were waving their despised hands in reply.

Despite all those Miles Franklins we have not yet been able to do Thea Astley justice.



Un Embarras de Richesse: Patrick White

The first, and perhaps the least confident of the three, had chosen an enormous satin bon-bon, of screeching pink, swathed so excessively on one side that the head conveyed an impression of disproportion, of deformity, of bulbous growth. But the uncertain lady was palpitating with her own daring, and glanced at the closer of her two companions, fishing for a scrap of praise.  Her friend would not concede it, however. For the second lady was secure in her own seasoned carapace, and would not have recognized her acquaintance except by compulsion. The second lady was wearing on her head a lacquered crab-shell. She was quite oblivious of it, of course. But there it sat, one real claw offering a diamond starfish, the other dangling a miniature conch in polished crystal. The unconscious wearer had divested herself conventionally of her gloves and was restoring suppleness to her hands. As she tried her nails on the air, it was seen that those, by some chance, were exactly the same shade as the audacious crab.
How the waiters adored the three insolent ladies, but it was at the third and obviously eldest that their most Italianate smiles were directed.
The third, or by now, the first lady, affected the most amusing hat of all. On her blue curls she had perched an innocent little conical felt, of a drab, an earth colour, so simple and unassuming that the owner might have been mistaken for some old, displaced clown, until it was noticed that fashion had tweaked the felt almost imperceptibly, and that smoke – yes, actual smoke – was issuing out of the ingenious cone.

Patrick White was Australian Literature for some twenty-five years. No other writer approached his reputation and esteem which reached its apogee with the Nobel Prize in 1973. Some conservatives affected to ‘prefer’ the Martin Boyd of Lucinda Brayford, a superbly written soap opera devoted to snobbery. They need not have been so bothered by White, he was essentially a reactionary himself. He dished it out to all manners and classes of our classless society but there is a tacit presence, a matter more of reflex than statement in his work, suggesting a refined sensibility and spirituality which lies somewhere amongst an Establishment or amongst Europeans like Voss. The volcano lady of the above passage is a representative of this shadowy aristocracy. Really, White despaired of Australians and sought solace amongst the rejects upon whom he placed the burden of sainthood, of spiritual perception.

Though he was a man of the expressionist theatre, White loved the idea of the saintly, the humble, the self-effacing. This is not so extraordinary: the most egocentric theatricals employ mantra moments and some play casts initiate performances with a little meditative huddle, like net and footballers laying hands upon each other before flinging them into the air and charging out to trample their opponents or audiences. The theatricals believe their frisson of innerness lends inspiration, makes them deep, or even that it lays an ensemble spirit over their egos rampant. And so it might for the unconscious is an irresistible force.

White romped around in the psyche, bringing it to light like no other writer; he was at home there as he never was in the world. White snatched glimpses of the world and parlayed these etchings into fiction and plays. The latter have always proved the less satisfactory: while they are vivid and funny, they lack drive, they do not ‘journey’, which is odd, for the plot trajectory of White’s novels is irresistible in its sweep through many excursions and the dialogue in his novels is incomparable. White caught Australian English at its Anglo-Celtic height, before immigration from elsewhere and a diminution in the influence of the written sent it on simpler, more direct, rougher, less literate ways.

We fell about laughing at his rendition of us – ‘yairs’ we tried not to say and shrieked at ‘Kevon’. There we – well, they – were: the pretentious, the uneducated, the unsophisticated, the coarse and vulgar. We readers of Patrick White loved being lacerated by the mirror and tape-recorder he held up to the not-us. Barry Humphries was doing something of the same kind at the same time but in that case it was unmitigated by the human.

White also had trouble with the human; his characters, detailed though they are, are sometimes not fleshed out. We are asked to believe of Sister de Santis in The Eye of the Storm (surely the great White novel?) that when not attending on Elizabeth Hunter and drinking gin and wine with Sir Basil at Doyle’s fish restaurant she subsists on a diet of tea and bread with National Geographics for company. Still, White was after other dimensions than the mundane and he was able to parade before us an endless array of characters whom we recognised in print for the first time as those who surrounded us. They babble in tongues which make other writers’ attempts at Australian English seem factitious, or utter vatic, paradoxical statements. Besides saying ‘yairs’, they suck viciously at their dentures and/or their gums (the oral is a very strong presence), are yellowish with brown patches or liver spots, scarlet splattered and blue veined, their hair, where they have it, is a writhing uncontrollable force and their faces collapse or become rictus with terror or rage in various convincing ways (White knew Francis Bacon). White’s characters are often costumed in expressionistic flesh, which was a wonderful relief in those days of ‘dun coloured realism’ (his words) and often hilarious because deadly accurate and revelatory of the reality which surrounded us but which we ourselves could not bring to consciousness and so name. However there is the unfortunate danger of these characters becoming jangled literary puppets. When the ordinary are not vicious in their banality, they are saints and sometimes martyrs. The ordinary tend to belong to the lower orders. The saints apotheosise in wondrous illumination. Whilst experiencing hers, Sister de Santis is surrounded by beating wings (they belong to birds, a pigeon in particular, but we are meant to take them for angels). In rendering such moments of divine possession White took breathtaking risks with bathos and sentimentality but his readers do not realise this for they are swept along by his sincerity. His tonal range – from slapstick through satire to metaphysical exaltation – is as wide as it could be and utterly assured. His sincerity saves him from a sadistic laying about him at the vanities and defences of fallible humanity. Sincerity is a catalyst for melodrama; White also escaped this falseness, just. Perhaps it is his brilliantly rendered acerbity which protected him. There is another shadowy presence in his writing besides an implied aristocracy - compassion, a recognised common humanity. It is constantly at risk from his rage but survives everywhere in his work as a recognition of human decency.

The Nobel Prize honoured him as a writer who had ‘introduced a new continent to literature’. No doubt it gave some Europeans comfort that we were laughable in the ways they expected and thrilled others with exotic possibilities, not least of a religious nature (it was a neo religious era: people tried to read Hesse for example, or under the influence of the Beatles practised transcendental meditation or dressed only in orangey shades of what was supposed to be saffron in the service of their cult which instantly evaporated at the whiff of scandal). However much Australia was White’s world, his writing was universal in its appeal. He was translated and admired very widely. Overseas readers could consider the Other which was us and discover themselves.

The power of art is celebrated in his fiction, especially painting. Music is also a strong presence and theatricals blunder their ways across his pages. Painting and music speak for the spirit; the theatre is more a necessary witness to the anarchic in life. While poetry is everywhere it is little mentioned.

White was drawn to Jewishness. The lady in the screeching pink bon-bon above is fleeing her Jewishness. She has embraced a second husband and the Church of England in the shape of ‘St Marks’ (doubtless of Darling Point in Sydney, in those days a site of social aspirations). White is ambivalent; his attitude partakes of his time – Anglo-Celtic Australians tended to sneer at the social aspirations of Jews as they clambered out of the ghettos and concentration camps and into the social elite but he also had a deep respect for the adherents of the religion and an interest in their plight. Jews are parvenus and the Scapegoat. The saturnine Mrs Lippmann of The Eye of the Storm is a tragic figure, unable even in the antipodes to escape her fate – at which one must balk. Jews, for White (as they are in the present era for Christos Tsiolkas) are the dark side of Europe, a powerful, subterfuginous force. White, born to the Establishment himself, resented all kinds of parvenus and had little care for social injustice at any systemic level though he of course liked to ladle out charity (this is characteristic of the type). The Jews were fascinating in their place. The trouble was, their place was untenable. It satisfied White to abandon them to the tragedy he had allotted them. He was in his fanciful complacency both ridiculous and disgusting but let us not forget he needed his puppets and his clowns for his great art; Jews were part of his collection of stock characters.

White wrestled more with the plight of Aborigines. His Alf Dubbo (of Riders in the Chariot), Aboriginal painter, is a valiant effort but like Sister de Santis is not so much a character as a spirit presence, something White seems sadly aware of in his efforts to bring the Aboriginal to life.

God was White’s subject; he pursues it relentlessly, discovering it all over and under the place. Improbable though it might seem, the possibility of apotheosis, of sainthood, of goodness even enters the restaurant in which the Bon-bon, the Crab-shell and the Volcano sprawl, exhausted by their effort at seeming.  The Volcano remembers a maid who was ‘a kind of saint’. She ‘cranes in the hopes that saving grace might just become visible in the depths of the purgatory in which they sat’ (the Italian waiters have turned the lights out on them). Her ‘crater was now extinct’.

Who else but Patrick White could give the hilarious such a plangent undertone?

White had a fecundity of invention, an imaginative power far beyond that of any other Australian writer. The Nobel publicists were not wrong, White told Australians of themselves as no other writer and revealed an emerging spiritscape to which Europeans had so far been oblivious.


SOURCES

Stead Christina 1983 For Love Alone  Angus and Robertson Australia (according to this edition 'First published by Peter Davies in 1945' but Chris Williams in her biography Christina Stead  A Life of Letters gives the details 'Harcourt Brace New York 1944) see p 35, p 67 & p 284

Stead David G 1906 Fishes of Australia  A Popular Study and Systematic Guide to the Study of the Wealth within our Waters William Brooks and Co Sydney see p 235

Stead David G 1963 Sharks and Rays of Australian Seas Angus and Robertson Sydney see p 48 & p 50

Astley Thea  Beachmasters Penguin Books Australian 1985  pp 118 – 128, p 182 & p 184

White Patrick 1976 (first published 1961)   Riders in the Chariot  Jonathan Cape London see pp 537 – 545

The quote about the Nobel Prize commendation comes from Marr David 1991 Patrick White  A Life  Random House Australia p 541





For a fictional account of two dinners with Patrick White please see the following blog.


I am going to complete THE WAY WE WERE with studies of Helen Garner and Frank Moorhouse thus making it five Australian novelists.